Writ petitions, constitutional litigation and appellate representation.
Not every grievance can be resolved by the court of first instance. Where a public authority has acted without lawful authority, where a fundamental right is at stake, or where a decision below requires correction, the remedy lies before the High Court.
Waqas Law Firm represents clients in constitutional and appellate matters arising from the courts and authorities at Gujrat. Appeals and writ petitions from this district are heard by the Lahore High Court, and proceedings there demand a different kind of preparation: a confined record, focused legal grounds, and argument that engages with the reasoning of the decision under challenge.
Constitutional petitions under Article 199 challenging actions taken without lawful authority.
Petitions where a right guaranteed by the Constitution is engaged.
Appeals against conviction or sentence, and revision petitions, before the appellate forum.
Regular and second appeals from decrees of the civil courts.
Challenging proceedings that amount to an abuse of the process of law.
Challenges to administrative decisions and orders of public authorities.
An appeal is not a second trial. The court is examining the decision below for legal error, so the petition has to identify precisely where the reasoning went wrong. Simply restating the case that already failed rarely succeeds.
Appellate and constitutional remedies carry strict time limits, and delay is one of the most common reasons a good case is never heard on its merits. If you are considering an appeal, the position should be assessed immediately.
Not every unfavourable decision is legally erroneous, and not every grievance is amenable to constitutional jurisdiction. Where a petition is unlikely to be maintainable, you will be told so before costs are incurred.
Every matter follows the same disciplined sequence, so you always know what stage your case is at and what happens next.
Understanding the facts, the risks and your legal position.
The first meeting is about establishing what actually happened and what the documents show. We identify the legal questions your matter raises, the forum it belongs in, and any time limits that are already running.
Clear options with an honest legal opinion.
You are told where your position is strong, where it is weak, and what the realistic routes forward are — including whether litigation is the right one. No assurances are given about outcomes, because no advocate controls how a court decides.
Effective drafting, advocacy and follow-up.
Pleadings and applications are drafted carefully, the record is prepared before each hearing, and the matter is argued on the grounds that actually carry weight. Follow-up between hearings is part of the work, not an afterthought.
Keeping you informed and involved throughout.
You are told what happened at each hearing, what it means for your case and what the next step is. Decisions that belong to you are put to you clearly, with the consequences of each option explained.
Concluding the matter, or advising on what follows.
When a matter concludes, we explain what the outcome means in practice — whether that is execution of a decree, compliance with an order, an available appeal, or steps to prevent the same dispute recurring.
Questions clients most often ask about high court & constitutional matters matters.
A writ petition is a constitutional remedy under Article 199 of the Constitution, by which a High Court may be asked to direct that an act done without lawful authority is of no legal effect, or to require a public authority to act as the law requires. It is not a general substitute for an appeal or a suit.
Gujrat district falls within the jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court, and matters arising from this district are ordinarily taken up at its Gujranwala Bench. The firm advises clients on the correct forum for their particular matter.
Limitation periods differ according to the type of appeal and the order being challenged, and they are strictly applied. Because the period runs from a fixed point, generally the date of the order or of a certified copy, the position should be checked as soon as the decision is received.
No. Constitutional jurisdiction is not available where an adequate alternative remedy exists, and it is not a route for re-arguing findings of fact. Whether a writ is maintainable in your case depends on the nature of the act challenged and the remedies otherwise open to you.
In most matters the advocate appears on your behalf and personal attendance is not required at every hearing. Where the court directs a party to appear in person, you will be informed in advance.
Bail is usually the first real decision point in a criminal case. This guide explains the difference between pre-arrest and post-arrest bail, why the sections in the FIR matter so much, and what a court actually weighs.
Contact the office to arrange a consultation and receive a realistic assessment of your position.
Contacting the firm does not by itself create a lawyer-client relationship. Please do not send confidential information until a relationship has been established.